Reply #1From: kevin@UVic.CADate: Fri, 5 Dec 97 01:52:17 yeah, so you're assuming that your buddie didn't get his donuts cause he's black. Maybe teh clerk at the dunkin donuts was just a retard. How do you immediately justify the clerks reactions as an action of hate against african americans? Shut the fuck up.
RebuttalThis one has taken a few weeks to get back to, basically because I've had better things to do, like watch my cat lick the spot where his balls used to be... Kevin, pal, bubbie... I didn't assume that my buddy didn't get his doughnuts because he was black, I assumed that he didn't get them because the guy at the counter was a racist hick asshole. I am quite sure that you don't see the difference, but trust me, it's there... By the way, the guy at the counter *was* a racist hick asshole. I would have sharpened that point a little finer if that was the actual point of the article in the first place, which it wasn't. The article was about apathy, and the small story about my friend was just an example. If you still want to know why I "immediately justified" (those whose first language is English may realize that you meant something like 'labeled') his "reactions" (or actions) as hatred towards blacks, I'll tell you. The guy got fired because he called someone else in the store a "fucking nigger" the very next week. Now, shut the fuck up? Heh. You're entitled to your opinion that I don't know what I'm talking about and shouldn't continue talking. Then again, I didn't force you to read that article, did I? I didn't spam it to every Canuck in Canada, did I? What you attempted to do was make me feel like a jerk because you're so smart. Boy, ya sure got me there, Sparky! You are now welcome to watch the counter roll as people from all over the world read your post and giggle at your dimwitted ass... Rebuttal #2From: John LieskeDate: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 07:18:14
|